{"id":87969,"date":"2026-02-13T21:54:22","date_gmt":"2026-02-14T00:54:22","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/tech.einnews.com\/article\/892240280"},"modified":"2026-02-13T21:54:22","modified_gmt":"2026-02-14T00:54:22","slug":"are-leveraged-etfs-right-for-your-portfolio-qlds-tech-bet-vs-ssos-higher-dividend","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/new7.shop\/zerocostfreehost\/index.php\/2026\/02\/13\/are-leveraged-etfs-right-for-your-portfolio-qlds-tech-bet-vs-ssos-higher-dividend\/","title":{"rendered":"Are Leveraged ETFs Right for Your Portfolio? QLD’s Tech Bet vs. SSO’s Higher Dividend."},"content":{"rendered":"

Explore how sector concentration and risk profiles set these leveraged ETFs apart for investors seeking targeted exposure.<\/p>\n

\n

Both ProShares – Ultra QQQ<\/strong> (QLD<\/a> +0.34%<\/span>)<\/span> and ProShares – Ultra S&P500<\/strong> (SSO<\/a> +0.02%<\/span>)<\/span> aim to double the daily moves of their respective large-cap indexes, but QLD leans harder into technology, tracking the Nasdaq-100<\/strong> while SSO follows the broader S&P 500<\/strong>. This comparison unpacks how their performance, risk, and sector exposures may appeal to different types of investors seeking leveraged ETF strategies. <\/p>\n

Snapshot (cost & size)<\/h2>\n
\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n
Metric<\/th>\nSSO<\/th>\nQLD<\/th>\n<\/tr>\n
Issuer<\/td>\nProShares<\/td>\nProShares<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Expense ratio<\/td>\n0.88%<\/td>\n0.98%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
1-yr return (as of 2\/4\/2026)<\/td>\n21.3%<\/td>\n20.64%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Dividend yield<\/td>\n1.14%<\/td>\n0.16%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Beta<\/td>\n2.03<\/td>\n2.28<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
AUM<\/td>\n$8.12 billion<\/td>\n$10.75 billion<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<\/div>\n

Beta measures price volatility relative to the S&P 500; beta is calculated from five-year monthly returns. The one-year return represents total return over the trailing 12 months.<\/p>\n

QLD charges a 0.10 percentage point higher expense ratio than SSO, making SSO more affordable for cost-conscious investors. SSO also offers a higher dividend yield, while QLD\u2019s yield is notably lower.<\/p>\n

Performance & risk comparison<\/h2>\n
\n\n\n\n\n\n
Metric<\/th>\nSSO<\/th>\nQLD<\/th>\n<\/tr>\n
Max drawdown (5 y)<\/td>\n(46.73%)<\/td>\n(63.68%)<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Growth of $1,000 over 5 years<\/td>\n$2,401<\/td>\n$2,143<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<\/div>\n

What’s inside<\/h2>\n

QLD seeks to double the daily returns of the Nasdaq-100, resulting in a concentrated portfolio of 101 stocks, with technology accounting for 53%, followed by communication services at 16%, and consumer cyclical at 13%. Top holdings include Nvidia<\/strong>, Apple<\/strong>, and Microsoft<\/strong>. The fund has nearly 20 years of history and, like SSO, resets its leverage daily\u2014an important feature for long-term holders to consider.<\/p>\n

\n
\n
\n
\"ProShares<\/div>\n
\n

ProShares Trust – ProShares Ultra Qqq<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n

\n
\n

Today’s Change<\/p>\n

(0.34%) $0.23<\/p>\n

Current Price<\/p>\n

$66.92<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n

\n
\n

Key Data Points<\/h3>\n
\n

Day’s Range<\/p>\n

$65.74 – $67.95<\/p>\n

52wk Range<\/p>\n

$32.36 – $76.67<\/p>\n

Volume<\/p>\n

4.9M<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/section>\n

By contrast, SSO offers exposure to the broader S&P 500, spreading its 2 times leverage across 503 holdings. While it still features heavyweights like Nvidia, Apple, and Microsoft, SSO\u2019s sector exposure is less concentrated, with 34% in technology, 13% in financial services, and 11% in communication services. Both funds are designed for tactical use, but SSO\u2019s broader diversification may appeal to those seeking less sector risk.<\/p>\n

\n
\n
\n
\"ProShares<\/div>\n
\n

ProShares Trust – ProShares Ultra S&p500<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n

\n
\n

Today’s Change<\/p>\n

(0.02%) $0.01<\/p>\n

Current Price<\/p>\n

$57.37<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n

\n
\n

Key Data Points<\/h3>\n
\n

Day’s Range<\/p>\n

$56.69 – $58.16<\/p>\n

52wk Range<\/p>\n

$30.42 – $60.37<\/p>\n

Volume<\/p>\n

5.8M<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/section>\n

For more guidance on ETF investing, check out the full guide at this link<\/a>.<\/p>\n

What this means for investors<\/h2>\n

Both QLD and SSO<\/a> offer investors the opportunity to buy leveraged exposure to different market indexes under one ticker. The funds track different benchmark market indexes, but both aim to double the daily performance of their respective indexes by using derivatives like futures and swaps. In both cases, this leverage is reset daily, which means the funds essentially double the returns of the Nasdaq-100 or S&P 500 every day. This can be an attractive option, but more so for day-traders than long-term investors, as the volatility can both affect the long-term returns of the fund and also amplify losses during downturns. For most long-term investors, simply holding a fund that tracks the performance of the S&P 500 or Nasdaq-100 and allowing compounding to guide returns is the better option.<\/p>\n

The primary difference between the two leveraged funds is which index they follow, with QLD leansing harder into technology. QLD also comes with a higher fee and has historically experienced greater downside volatility than SSO due to its higher concentration in the dynamic tech industry.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

<\/a><\/strong> <\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

… but QLD leans harder into technology<\/span>, tracking the Nasdaq-100 while … portfolio of 101 stocks, with technology<\/span> accounting for 53%, followed … less concentrated, with 34% in technology<\/span>, 13% in financial services, and … concentration in the dynamic tech<\/span> industry.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"fifu_image_url":"","fifu_image_alt":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-87969","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-news","wpcat-1-id"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/new7.shop\/zerocostfreehost\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/87969","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/new7.shop\/zerocostfreehost\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/new7.shop\/zerocostfreehost\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new7.shop\/zerocostfreehost\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new7.shop\/zerocostfreehost\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=87969"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/new7.shop\/zerocostfreehost\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/87969\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/new7.shop\/zerocostfreehost\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=87969"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new7.shop\/zerocostfreehost\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=87969"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new7.shop\/zerocostfreehost\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=87969"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}