{"id":73274,"date":"2026-02-02T05:45:04","date_gmt":"2026-02-02T08:45:04","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/tech.einnews.com\/article\/888590473"},"modified":"2026-02-02T05:45:04","modified_gmt":"2026-02-02T08:45:04","slug":"ftec-offers-broader-tech-exposure-than-xlk-but-theres-a-hidden-downside","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/new7.shop\/zerocostfreehost\/index.php\/2026\/02\/02\/ftec-offers-broader-tech-exposure-than-xlk-but-theres-a-hidden-downside\/","title":{"rendered":"FTEC Offers Broader Tech Exposure Than XLK, But There&#8217;s a Hidden Downside"},"content":{"rendered":"<div><img data-opt-id=758893364  fetchpriority=\"high\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"data:image\/gif;base64,R0lGODlhAQABAIAAAAAAAP\/\/\/ywAAAAAAQABAAACAUwAOw==\" fifu-lazy=\"1\" fifu-data-sizes=\"auto\" fifu-data-srcset=\"https:\/\/i1.wp.com\/g.foolcdn.com\/image\/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fcdn.content.foolcdn.com%2Fimages%2F1umn9qeh%2Fproduction%2F68e88b35844c8ea3f09f6b0350420ee30bed3518-1401x1251.png%3Fw%3D1401%26h%3D1251&w=1200&op=resize&ssl=1&w=75&resize=75&ssl=1 75w, https:\/\/i1.wp.com\/g.foolcdn.com\/image\/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fcdn.content.foolcdn.com%2Fimages%2F1umn9qeh%2Fproduction%2F68e88b35844c8ea3f09f6b0350420ee30bed3518-1401x1251.png%3Fw%3D1401%26h%3D1251&w=1200&op=resize&ssl=1&w=100&resize=100&ssl=1 100w, https:\/\/i1.wp.com\/g.foolcdn.com\/image\/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fcdn.content.foolcdn.com%2Fimages%2F1umn9qeh%2Fproduction%2F68e88b35844c8ea3f09f6b0350420ee30bed3518-1401x1251.png%3Fw%3D1401%26h%3D1251&w=1200&op=resize&ssl=1&w=150&resize=150&ssl=1 150w, https:\/\/i1.wp.com\/g.foolcdn.com\/image\/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fcdn.content.foolcdn.com%2Fimages%2F1umn9qeh%2Fproduction%2F68e88b35844c8ea3f09f6b0350420ee30bed3518-1401x1251.png%3Fw%3D1401%26h%3D1251&w=1200&op=resize&ssl=1&w=240&resize=240&ssl=1 240w, https:\/\/i1.wp.com\/g.foolcdn.com\/image\/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fcdn.content.foolcdn.com%2Fimages%2F1umn9qeh%2Fproduction%2F68e88b35844c8ea3f09f6b0350420ee30bed3518-1401x1251.png%3Fw%3D1401%26h%3D1251&w=1200&op=resize&ssl=1&w=320&resize=320&ssl=1 320w, https:\/\/i1.wp.com\/g.foolcdn.com\/image\/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fcdn.content.foolcdn.com%2Fimages%2F1umn9qeh%2Fproduction%2F68e88b35844c8ea3f09f6b0350420ee30bed3518-1401x1251.png%3Fw%3D1401%26h%3D1251&w=1200&op=resize&ssl=1&w=500&resize=500&ssl=1 500w, https:\/\/i1.wp.com\/g.foolcdn.com\/image\/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fcdn.content.foolcdn.com%2Fimages%2F1umn9qeh%2Fproduction%2F68e88b35844c8ea3f09f6b0350420ee30bed3518-1401x1251.png%3Fw%3D1401%26h%3D1251&w=1200&op=resize&ssl=1&w=640&resize=640&ssl=1 640w, https:\/\/i1.wp.com\/g.foolcdn.com\/image\/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fcdn.content.foolcdn.com%2Fimages%2F1umn9qeh%2Fproduction%2F68e88b35844c8ea3f09f6b0350420ee30bed3518-1401x1251.png%3Fw%3D1401%26h%3D1251&w=1200&op=resize&ssl=1&w=800&resize=800&ssl=1 800w, https:\/\/i1.wp.com\/g.foolcdn.com\/image\/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fcdn.content.foolcdn.com%2Fimages%2F1umn9qeh%2Fproduction%2F68e88b35844c8ea3f09f6b0350420ee30bed3518-1401x1251.png%3Fw%3D1401%26h%3D1251&w=1200&op=resize&ssl=1&w=1024&resize=1024&ssl=1 1024w, https:\/\/i1.wp.com\/g.foolcdn.com\/image\/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fcdn.content.foolcdn.com%2Fimages%2F1umn9qeh%2Fproduction%2F68e88b35844c8ea3f09f6b0350420ee30bed3518-1401x1251.png%3Fw%3D1401%26h%3D1251&w=1200&op=resize&ssl=1&w=1280&resize=1280&ssl=1 1280w, https:\/\/i1.wp.com\/g.foolcdn.com\/image\/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fcdn.content.foolcdn.com%2Fimages%2F1umn9qeh%2Fproduction%2F68e88b35844c8ea3f09f6b0350420ee30bed3518-1401x1251.png%3Fw%3D1401%26h%3D1251&w=1200&op=resize&ssl=1&w=1600&resize=1600&ssl=1 1600w\" fifu-data-src=\"https:\/\/i1.wp.com\/g.foolcdn.com\/image\/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fcdn.content.foolcdn.com%2Fimages%2F1umn9qeh%2Fproduction%2F68e88b35844c8ea3f09f6b0350420ee30bed3518-1401x1251.png%3Fw%3D1401%26h%3D1251&w=1200&op=resize&ssl=1\" class=\"ff-og-image-inserted\"><\/div>\n<p>Explore how two popular tech ETFs differ in diversification, holdings, and risk &#8212; key factors for building a resilient portfolio.<\/p>\n<div id=\"article-body\">\n<p>The <strong>State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF<\/strong> <span class=\"ticker-mention inline-flex items-center font-bold\" data-id=\"208773\">(<a href=\"https:\/\/www.fool.com\/quote\/nysemkt\/xlk\/\" class=\"font-bold hover:underline\">XLK<\/a> <span class=\"ml-1 text-red-900\">2.04%<\/span>)<\/span> and the <strong>Fidelity MSCI Information Technology Index ETF<\/strong> <span class=\"ticker-mention inline-flex items-center font-bold\" data-id=\"289214\">(<a href=\"https:\/\/www.fool.com\/quote\/nysemkt\/ftec\/\" class=\"font-bold hover:underline\">FTEC<\/a> <span class=\"ml-1 text-red-900\">1.75%<\/span>)<\/span> both target the U.S. technology sector, but they take slightly different approaches. XLK tracks a narrower slice of the S&amp;P 500, while FTEC tracks a broader MSCI index covering more companies. <\/p>\n<p>This comparison examines cost, performance, risk, portfolio composition, and other features to help investors determine which approach may appeal more.<\/p>\n<h2 id=\"snapshot-cost-amp-size\" class=\"my-6 text-2xl font-bold\">Snapshot (cost &amp; size)<\/h2>\n<div class=\"table-responsive\">\n<table>\n<tbody>\n<tr>\n<th>Metric<\/th>\n<th>XLK<\/th>\n<th>FTEC<\/th>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Issuer<\/td>\n<td>SPDR<\/td>\n<td>Fidelity<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Expense ratio<\/td>\n<td>0.08%<\/td>\n<td>0.08%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>1-yr return (as of Jan. 27, 2026)<\/td>\n<td>23.76%<\/td>\n<td>20.57%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Dividend yield<\/td>\n<td>0.54%<\/td>\n<td>0.43%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>AUM<\/td>\n<td>$92 billion<\/td>\n<td>$17 billion<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Beta (5Y monthly)<\/td>\n<td>1.21<\/td>\n<td>1.28<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<\/div>\n<p class=\"caption\"><em>Beta measures price volatility relative to the S&amp;P 500. The 1-yr return represents total return over the trailing 12&nbsp;months.<\/em><\/p>\n<p>Both ETFs are equally affordable with a 0.08% expense ratio, but XLK offers a slightly higher dividend yield. The most notable difference in cost-related factors is scale: XLK\u2019s assets under management (AUM) is more than five times larger than FTEC\u2019s.<\/p>\n<h2 id=\"performance-amp-risk-comparison\" class=\"my-6 text-2xl font-bold\">Performance &amp; risk comparison<\/h2>\n<div class=\"table-responsive\">\n<table>\n<tbody>\n<tr>\n<th>Metric<\/th>\n<th>XLK<\/th>\n<th>FTEC<\/th>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Max drawdown (5 y)<\/td>\n<td>-33.56%<\/td>\n<td>-34.95%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Growth of $1,000 over 5 years<\/td>\n<td>$2,129<\/td>\n<td>$2,210<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<\/div>\n<h2 id=\"whatx27s-inside\" class=\"my-6 text-2xl font-bold\">What&#8217;s inside<\/h2>\n<p>FTEC tracks the MSCI USA IMI Information Technology 25\/50 Index, holding 289 stocks from various corners of the technology sector. Its top three positions \u2014 <strong>Nvidia<\/strong>, <strong>Microsoft<\/strong>, and <strong>Apple<\/strong> \u2014 make up more than 44% of assets, but the remaining holdings provide broader exposure across the sector.<\/p>\n<p>XLK also targets technology, but with only 70 holdings. Its largest holdings match FTEC\u2019s, but those three stocks make up just under 40% of the fund. Both ETFs carry no notable structural quirks and track major technology benchmarks.<\/p>\n<p>For more guidance on ETF investing, check out the full guide at <a href=\"https:\/\/www.fool.com\/investing\/how-to-invest\/etfs\/\" class=\"text-cyan-900 hover:text-cyan-800\">this link<\/a>.<\/p>\n<h2 id=\"what-this-means-for-investors\" class=\"my-6 text-2xl font-bold\">What this means for investors<\/h2>\n<p>XLK and FTEC are similar in many ways, both focusing on the tech sector with heavy tilts toward industry-leading giants. The two funds have identical expense ratios, though XLK has a slight edge in income with a higher dividend yield.<\/p>\n<p>While they have similar performance histories and risk profiles, FTEC has a slightly higher beta and a deeper max drawdown \u2014 suggesting marginally larger price swings over the last five years.<\/p>\n<p>Diversification is one of the primary differences between them. FTEC is the broader of the two, with over four times as many holdings as XLK. However, it also has a slightly heavier tilt toward its top three holdings, with those stocks comprising 44% of the portfolio compared to 39% for XLK.<\/p>\n<p>That may not seem like a major difference, but if Nvidia, Microsoft, or Apple performs particularly well or experiences significant volatility, it could widen the gap in total returns between these two funds.<\/p>\n<p>The other major difference is AUM. XLK is substantially larger in this area, and greater liquidity allows investors to make larger transactions without causing the fund\u2019s price to swing. This may not necessarily be a deciding factor for everyday investors, but it\u2019s something to consider when many of these ETFs\u2019 other attributes are so similar.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<p><strong><a href=\"https:\/\/blockads.fivefilters.org\"> <\/a><\/strong> <a href=\"https:\/\/blockads.fivefilters.org\/acceptable.html\"> <\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Explore how two popular <span class=\"match\">tech<\/span> ETFs differ in diversification, &#8230; portfolio. The State Street <span class=\"match\">Technology<\/span> Select Sector SPDR ETF ( &#8230; structural quirks and track major <span class=\"match\">technology<\/span> benchmarks. For more guidance &#8230; both focusing on the <span class=\"match\">tech<\/span> sector with heavy tilts toward &#8230;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"fifu_image_url":"","fifu_image_alt":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-73274","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-news","wpcat-1-id"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/new7.shop\/zerocostfreehost\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/73274","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/new7.shop\/zerocostfreehost\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/new7.shop\/zerocostfreehost\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new7.shop\/zerocostfreehost\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new7.shop\/zerocostfreehost\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=73274"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/new7.shop\/zerocostfreehost\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/73274\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/new7.shop\/zerocostfreehost\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=73274"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new7.shop\/zerocostfreehost\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=73274"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new7.shop\/zerocostfreehost\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=73274"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}